PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+90.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $5,293 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
✅Delivers 742.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 64,355).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

2020

Why buy it

✅+297% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+1180% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,266 vs 2,407).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

2020

Why buy it

✅+90.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $5,293 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
✅Delivers 742.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+297% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+1180% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 64,355).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,266 vs 2,407).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the better fit. You are getting 297% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1180% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $5,293 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $5,489 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 297% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 742.1% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 15.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
1080p
low	171 FPS	173 FPS
medium	158 FPS	142 FPS
high	132 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	97 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	152 FPS
medium	123 FPS	122 FPS
high	99 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	71 FPS
medium	74 FPS	61 FPS
high	59 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	40 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
1080p
low	545 FPS	571 FPS
medium	464 FPS	495 FPS
high	389 FPS	380 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	325 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	480 FPS
medium	403 FPS	423 FPS
high	345 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	272 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	301 FPS
medium	247 FPS	269 FPS
high	231 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	201 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
1080p
low	530 FPS	660 FPS
medium	449 FPS	546 FPS
high	415 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	412 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	555 FPS
medium	422 FPS	465 FPS
high	382 FPS	412 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	354 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	406 FPS
medium	331 FPS	323 FPS
high	296 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	227 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
1080p
low	626 FPS	909 FPS
medium	626 FPS	818 FPS
high	626 FPS	695 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	604 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	739 FPS
medium	626 FPS	643 FPS
high	598 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	463 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	514 FPS
medium	492 FPS	461 FPS
high	439 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	346 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 54 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX's 83,235 — a 107.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 64,355 (119.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,266, a 62.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 20,256 (55.9% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	64 / 128+540%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+10%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.7 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	256 MB+1180%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	25,029	83,235+233%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	64,355+297%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+90%	1,266
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	20,256+78%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Socket	LGA1700	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX debuted at $5489. On MSRP ($196 vs $5489), the Core i5-13400F is $5293 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — making the Core i5-13400F the 157.5% better value option.