PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,299 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
✅Delivers 324.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 53,977).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +53.9% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,299 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
✅Delivers 324.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +53.9% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 53,977).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 53.9% more average FPS across 7 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 20 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is the better fit. You are getting 233% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 540% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 1173.0% more expensive on MSRP at $2,495 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 53.9% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 324.9% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 30.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8. That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
1080p
low	171 FPS	223 FPS
medium	158 FPS	184 FPS
high	132 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	114 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	194 FPS
medium	123 FPS	156 FPS
high	99 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	94 FPS
medium	74 FPS	81 FPS
high	59 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	51 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
1080p
low	545 FPS	777 FPS
medium	464 FPS	660 FPS
high	389 FPS	516 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	447 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	631 FPS
medium	403 FPS	548 FPS
high	345 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	364 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	369 FPS
medium	247 FPS	322 FPS
high	231 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	255 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
1080p
low	530 FPS	783 FPS
medium	449 FPS	661 FPS
high	415 FPS	604 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	528 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	597 FPS
medium	422 FPS	503 FPS
high	382 FPS	455 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	394 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	436 FPS
medium	331 FPS	351 FPS
high	296 FPS	317 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	253 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
1080p
low	626 FPS	1212 FPS
medium	626 FPS	1015 FPS
high	626 FPS	924 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	818 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	949 FPS
medium	626 FPS	826 FPS
high	598 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	609 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	673 FPS
medium	492 FPS	604 FPS
high	439 FPS	527 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX's 74,985 — a 99.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 53,977 (107.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,686, a 35.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 29,745 (89.1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	32 / 64+220%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+2%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	128 MB+540%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark	25,029	74,985+200%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	53,977+233%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+43%	1,686
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	29,745+161%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Socket	LGA1700	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX debuted at $2495. On MSRP ($196 vs $2495), the Core i5-13400F is $2299 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — making the Core i5-13400F the 123.8% better value option.