PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $233 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 40,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 127.7 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅Delivers 23.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
118.9% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$196 MSRP
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $233 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅Delivers 23.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 40,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 127.7 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌
118.9% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$196 MSRP
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 29.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the better fit. You are getting 146.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is 118.9% more expensive on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 29.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 23.3% better value on MSRP (157.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low	171 FPS	297 FPS
medium	158 FPS	270 FPS
high	132 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	188 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	273 FPS
medium	123 FPS	224 FPS
high	99 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	153 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	187 FPS
medium	74 FPS	154 FPS
high	59 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	104 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low	545 FPS	781 FPS
medium	464 FPS	642 FPS
high	389 FPS	476 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	402 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	641 FPS
medium	403 FPS	546 FPS
high	345 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	326 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	360 FPS
medium	247 FPS	310 FPS
high	231 FPS	271 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	228 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low	530 FPS	888 FPS
medium	449 FPS	705 FPS
high	415 FPS	622 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	534 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	713 FPS
medium	422 FPS	567 FPS
high	382 FPS	489 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	414 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	507 FPS
medium	331 FPS	418 FPS
high	296 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	315 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low	626 FPS	1106 FPS
medium	626 FPS	991 FPS
high	626 FPS	867 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	781 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	860 FPS
medium	626 FPS	759 FPS
high	598 FPS	664 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	576 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	632 FPS
medium	492 FPS	562 FPS
high	439 FPS	496 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	429 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 16% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 91.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 40,000 (84.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 3,016, a 22.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 23,596 (69.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	16 / 32+60%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.4 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	4.5 GHz+80%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+220%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark	25,029	67,561+170%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	40,000+147%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	3,016+25%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	23,596+107%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Socket	LGA1700	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($196 vs $429), the Core i5-13400F is $233 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 20.9% better value option.