Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

32 Cores64 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Threadripper Pro family

···

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX Performance Spectrum

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

32 / 64

106,263

+324.6%

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,903 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).
✅Delivers 392.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 25.9 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 83,982).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.9 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($4,099 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX better than Core i5-13400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 36.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 20 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 418.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 540% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX comes in 1991.3% more expensive on MSRP at $4,099 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 36.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 392.6% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 25.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 20 MB, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 106,263 points. Launch price was $4,099.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX — a 16% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX's 106,263 — a 123.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 83,982 (135.3% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 3,200, a 28.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 31,000 (92.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	32 / 64+220%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.4 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	4 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+540%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark	25,029	106,263+325%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	83,982+418%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	3,200+33%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	31,000+172%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
Socket	LGA1700	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Gaming	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX came in at $4099. On launch pricing ($196 vs $4099), Core i5-13400F was $3903 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 25.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX — making the Core i5-13400F the 132.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP	$196-95%	$4099
Performance per Dollar	127.7+393%	25.9
Release Date	2023	2025

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.