
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z2 Extreme
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+3.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Z2 Extreme.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z2 Extreme across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 Extreme mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Ryzen Z2 Extreme
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,177 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Ryzen Z2 Extreme
2025Why buy it
- ✅+3.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Z2 Extreme.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z2 Extreme across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 Extreme mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,177 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Z2 Extreme better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Z2 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Z2 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Z2 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 604 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 435 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 320 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Z2 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 604 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 604 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 401 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen Z2 Extreme
Ryzen Z2 Extreme
The Ryzen Z2 Extreme is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,177 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Z2 Extreme offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Extreme — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z2 Extreme (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Z2 Extreme uses Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen Z2 Extreme's 24,177 — a 3.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Extreme.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Z2 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 8 MB+540% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 25,029+4% | 24,177 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Z2 Extreme uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Z2 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen Z2 Extreme). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen Z2 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












