
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Xeon 6337P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+19.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6337P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6337P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 127.7 vs 348.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Xeon 6337P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $136 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 173.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 348.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,917 vs 25,029).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Xeon 6337P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+19.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6337P.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $136 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 173.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 348.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6337P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 127.7 vs 348.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,917 vs 25,029).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6337P better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 95 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 223 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 523 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 478 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 328 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 523 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 516 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 366 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon 6337P

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon 6337P
Xeon 6337P
The Xeon 6337P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 20,917 points. Launch price was $375.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6337P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5 GHz on the Xeon 6337P — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 6337P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6337P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon 6337P's 20,917 — a 17.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon 6337P.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+11% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,029+20% | 20,917 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon 6337P). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon 6337P debuted at $60. On MSRP ($196 vs $60), the Xeon 6337P is $136 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 348.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6337P — making the Xeon 6337P the 92.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196 | $60-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7 | 348.6+173% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













