Core i5-13400F vs Xeon 6337P

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon 6337P

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • +19.7% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6337P.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6337P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 127.7 vs 348.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Xeon 6337P

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $136 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • Delivers 173.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 348.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (20,917 vs 25,029).
  • 23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6337P better than Core i5-13400F?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6337P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 19.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon 6337P is the smarter buy today. Xeon 6337P is $136 cheaper on MSRP at $60 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i5-13400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 19.7% better PassMark. It is also 173.0% better value on MSRP (348.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6337P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FXeon 6337P
1080p
low171 FPS274 FPS
medium158 FPS257 FPS
high132 FPS216 FPS
ultra112 FPS186 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS239 FPS
medium123 FPS200 FPS
high99 FPS163 FPS
ultra84 FPS143 FPS
4K
low81 FPS166 FPS
medium74 FPS139 FPS
high59 FPS108 FPS
ultra46 FPS95 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FXeon 6337P
1080p
low545 FPS523 FPS
medium464 FPS484 FPS
high389 FPS408 FPS
ultra356 FPS364 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS493 FPS
medium403 FPS430 FPS
high345 FPS366 FPS
ultra301 FPS314 FPS
4K
low280 FPS315 FPS
medium247 FPS280 FPS
high231 FPS261 FPS
ultra204 FPS223 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FXeon 6337P
1080p
low530 FPS523 FPS
medium449 FPS523 FPS
high415 FPS523 FPS
ultra375 FPS523 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS523 FPS
medium422 FPS523 FPS
high382 FPS523 FPS
ultra343 FPS478 FPS
4K
low393 FPS511 FPS
medium331 FPS454 FPS
high296 FPS393 FPS
ultra246 FPS328 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FXeon 6337P
1080p
low626 FPS523 FPS
medium626 FPS523 FPS
high626 FPS523 FPS
ultra626 FPS523 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS523 FPS
medium626 FPS523 FPS
high598 FPS523 FPS
ultra521 FPS516 FPS
4K
low535 FPS523 FPS
medium492 FPS495 FPS
high439 FPS434 FPS
ultra382 FPS366 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon 6337P

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Xeon 6337P

The Xeon 6337P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 20,917 points. Launch price was $375.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6337P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5 GHz on the Xeon 6337P — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 6337P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6337P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon 6337P's 20,917 — a 17.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon 6337P.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon 6337P
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+67%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+11%
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark
25,029+20%
20,917
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon 6337P
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon 6337P). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon 6337P
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon 6337P debuted at $60. On MSRP ($196 vs $60), the Xeon 6337P is $136 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 348.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6337P — making the Xeon 6337P the 92.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon 6337P
MSRP
$196
$60-69%
Performance per Dollar
127.7
348.6+173%
Release Date
2023
2025