PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,799 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Delivers 701.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6737P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6737P across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,408 vs 45,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6737P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Xeon 6737P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon 6737P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,799 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Delivers 701.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6737P.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6737P across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,408 vs 45,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6737P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6737P better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6737P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6737P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 35 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 144 MB vs 20 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6737P is the better fit. You are getting 294.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 620% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6737P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon 6737P is 2448.5% more expensive on MSRP at $4,995 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 35 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 701.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 15.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6737P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 144 MB L3 cache instead of 20 MB, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon 6737P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6737P
1080p
low	171 FPS	190 FPS
medium	158 FPS	166 FPS
high	132 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	156 FPS
medium	123 FPS	132 FPS
high	99 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	71 FPS
medium	74 FPS	63 FPS
high	59 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	40 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6737P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6737P
1080p
low	545 FPS	520 FPS
medium	464 FPS	460 FPS
high	389 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	425 FPS
medium	403 FPS	383 FPS
high	345 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	262 FPS
medium	247 FPS	239 FPS
high	231 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	176 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6737P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6737P
1080p
low	530 FPS	883 FPS
medium	449 FPS	813 FPS
high	415 FPS	768 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	677 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	756 FPS
medium	422 FPS	692 FPS
high	382 FPS	650 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	581 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	510 FPS
medium	331 FPS	429 FPS
high	296 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	318 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6737P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6737P
1080p
low	626 FPS	985 FPS
medium	626 FPS	886 FPS
high	626 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	665 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	806 FPS
medium	626 FPS	701 FPS
high	598 FPS	604 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	519 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	582 FPS
medium	492 FPS	521 FPS
high	439 FPS	462 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	397 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6737P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon 6737P

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon 6737P

The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6737P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6737P has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 — a 104.3% lead for the Xeon 6737P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,000, a 18.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 45,000 (119.1% advantage for the Xeon 6737P). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6737P
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	32 / 64+220%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+15%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	144 MB (total)+620%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	25,029	79,634+218%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+20%	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	45,000+294%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon 6737P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Xeon 6737P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 88 (Xeon 6737P) — the Xeon 6737P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6737P
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	88+340%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6737P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6737P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon 6737P debuted at $4995. On MSRP ($196 vs $4995), the Core i5-13400F is $4799 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P — making the Core i5-13400F the 155.6% better value option.