PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,069 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
✅Delivers 782.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6740E.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6740E across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 76,167).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6740E, which brings 96 cores / 96 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Xeon 6740E

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 96 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon 6740E

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,069 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
✅Delivers 782.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6740E.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 96 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6740E across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 76,167).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6740E, which brings 96 cores / 96 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6740E better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6740E makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6740E is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 11.1% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 96 MB vs 20 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6740E is the better fit. You are getting 204.3% better PassMark, backed by 96 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 380% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6740E is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon 6740E is 2586.2% more expensive on MSRP at $5,265 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 11.1% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 782.7% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 14.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6740E is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 96 MB L3 cache instead of 20 MB, more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 96 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon 6740E Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6740E
1080p
low	171 FPS	189 FPS
medium	158 FPS	152 FPS
high	132 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	153 FPS
medium	123 FPS	119 FPS
high	99 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	71 FPS
medium	74 FPS	59 FPS
high	59 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	38 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6740E

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6740E
1080p
low	545 FPS	437 FPS
medium	464 FPS	378 FPS
high	389 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	241 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	359 FPS
medium	403 FPS	319 FPS
high	345 FPS	266 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	203 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	222 FPS
medium	247 FPS	201 FPS
high	231 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	135 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6740E

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6740E
1080p
low	530 FPS	934 FPS
medium	449 FPS	831 FPS
high	415 FPS	779 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	693 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	746 FPS
medium	422 FPS	655 FPS
high	382 FPS	614 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	546 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	479 FPS
medium	331 FPS	378 FPS
high	296 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	272 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6740E

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6740E
1080p
low	626 FPS	918 FPS
medium	626 FPS	830 FPS
high	626 FPS	715 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	610 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	710 FPS
medium	626 FPS	620 FPS
high	598 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	450 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	509 FPS
medium	492 FPS	455 FPS
high	439 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	344 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6740E

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon 6740E

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon 6740E

The Xeon 6740E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 76,167 points. Launch price was $5,265.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6740E offers 96 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740E has 86 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6740E — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6740E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon 6740E's 76,167 — a 101.1% lead for the Xeon 6740E. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740E.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6740E
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	96 / 96+860%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+44%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	96 MB (total)+380%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	4 MB (per module)+220%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Sierra Forest (2024)
PassMark	25,029	76,167+204%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6740E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 6400 on the Xeon 6740E — the Xeon 6740E supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6740E supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Xeon 6740E). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 80 (Xeon 6740E) — the Xeon 6740E offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C741 (Xeon 6740E).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6740E
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	6400+127900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+4915100%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	80+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6740E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6740E). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon 6740E rivals EPYC 9005.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6740E
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, TDX
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon 6740E debuted at $5265. On MSRP ($196 vs $5265), the Core i5-13400F is $5069 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740E — making the Core i5-13400F the 159.3% better value option.