
Core i5-13400F

Xeon 6740E
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon 6740E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon 6740E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon 6740E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- β Costs $5,069 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- β Delivers 782.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6740E.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (25,029 vs 76,167).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 96 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6740E, which brings 96 cores / 96 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
Xeon 6740E
2024Why buy it
- β +204.3% higher PassMark.
- β +380% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 20 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 96 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- β 300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- β284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon 6740E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon 6740E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon 6740E
The Xeon 6740E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 76,167 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6740E offers 96 cores / 96 threads β the Xeon 6740E has 86 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6740E β a 35.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6740E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon 6740E's 76,167 β a 101.1% lead for the Xeon 6740E. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740E.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 96 / 96+860% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+44% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+380% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+220% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 76,167+204% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6740E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 6400 on the Xeon 6740E β the Xeon 6740E supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6740E supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB β 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Xeon 6740E). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 80 (Xeon 6740E) β the Xeon 6740E offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C741 (Xeon 6740E).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 6400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 80+300% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6740E supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6740E). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon 6740E rivals EPYC 9005.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, TDX |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Xeon 6740E came in at $5265. On launch pricing ($196 vs $5265), Core i5-13400F was $5069 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740E β making the Core i5-13400F the 159.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-96% | $5265 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+781% | 14.5 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















