PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+20.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $6,301 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 715.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 330W, a 265W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6747P.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,408 vs 45,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6747P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅+294.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+1340% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,000 vs 2,407).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌407.7% higher power demand at 330W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅+20.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $6,301 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 715.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 330W, a 265W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6747P.

Why buy it

✅+294.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+1340% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,408 vs 45,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6747P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,000 vs 2,407).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌407.7% higher power demand at 330W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon 6747P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6747P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6747P is the better fit. You are getting 294.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1340% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $6,301 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $6,497 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon 6747P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 294.5% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 715.9% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 15.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6747P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 1340% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 20 MB), more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon 6747P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	171 FPS	188 FPS
medium	158 FPS	165 FPS
high	132 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	155 FPS
medium	123 FPS	131 FPS
high	99 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	70 FPS
medium	74 FPS	63 FPS
high	59 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	40 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6747P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	545 FPS	520 FPS
medium	464 FPS	460 FPS
high	389 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	425 FPS
medium	403 FPS	383 FPS
high	345 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	262 FPS
medium	247 FPS	239 FPS
high	231 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	176 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6747P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	530 FPS	849 FPS
medium	449 FPS	768 FPS
high	415 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	737 FPS
medium	422 FPS	662 FPS
high	382 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	493 FPS
medium	331 FPS	402 FPS
high	296 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	303 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6747P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	626 FPS	1034 FPS
medium	626 FPS	916 FPS
high	626 FPS	789 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	670 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	848 FPS
medium	626 FPS	727 FPS
high	598 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	525 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	613 FPS
medium	492 FPS	538 FPS
high	439 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	403 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon 6747P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon 6747P

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon 6747P

The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6747P has 38 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 121% lead for the Xeon 6747P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,000, a 18.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 45,000 (119.1% advantage for the Xeon 6747P). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6747P
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	48 / 96+380%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+18%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.7 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+1340%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	25,029	101,685+306%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+20%	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	45,000+294%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon 6747P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the Xeon 6747P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6747P
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	88+340%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6747P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon 6747P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon 6747P debuted at $6497. On MSRP ($196 vs $6497), the Core i5-13400F is $6301 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the Core i5-13400F the 156.3% better value option.