PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon D-1718T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon D-1718T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +53.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).
✅Costs $106 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $302 MSRP).
✅Delivers 298.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 32.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $302 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2227 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌41.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 46W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon D-1718T

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 46W instead of 65W, a 19W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (3,500 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($302 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2227 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon D-1718T?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1718T makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 53.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 225.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in $106 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $302 MSRP, and it still gives you a 53.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 298.6% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 32.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2227, 100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon D-1718T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon D-1718T

The Xeon D-1718T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,674 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-1718T offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1718T — a 27.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon D-1718T's 9,674 — a 88.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 900, a 91.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 3,500 (106.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 10 MB on the Xeon D-1718T.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon D-1718T
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+150%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+31%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.6 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+100%	10 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	25,029+159%	9,674
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+167%	900
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+226%	3,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-1718T uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-1718T — the Core i5-13400F supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-1718T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 16 (Xeon D-1718T) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and SoC (Xeon D-1718T).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon D-1718T
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+64%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon D-1718T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Xeon D-1718T targets Server/Edge. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon D-1718T
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Server/Edge

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Xeon D-1718T came in at $302. On launch pricing ($196 vs $302), Core i5-13400F was $106 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 32.0 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1718T — making the Core i5-13400F the 119.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon D-1718T
MSRP	$196-35%	$302
Performance per Dollar	127.7+299%	32.0
Release Date	2023	2022

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Search Xeon D-1718T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.