PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB).
✅Costs $104 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 158.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 49.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2227 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌22.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 53W.

Xeon D-1733NT

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 53W instead of 65W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,849 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2227 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon D-1733NT

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB).
✅Costs $104 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 158.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 49.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2227 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Draws 53W instead of 65W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌22.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 53W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,849 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2227 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon D-1733NT?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon D-1733NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 25.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 68.6% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $104 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it gives you a 25.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 158.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 49.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2227, 33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon D-1733NT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon D-1733NT
1080p
low	171 FPS	177 FPS
medium	158 FPS	144 FPS
high	132 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	143 FPS
medium	123 FPS	114 FPS
high	99 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	68 FPS
medium	74 FPS	57 FPS
high	59 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon D-1733NT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon D-1733NT
1080p
low	545 FPS	159 FPS
medium	464 FPS	139 FPS
high	389 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	139 FPS
medium	403 FPS	126 FPS
high	345 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	90 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	101 FPS
medium	247 FPS	94 FPS
high	231 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	65 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon D-1733NT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon D-1733NT
1080p
low	530 FPS	371 FPS
medium	449 FPS	371 FPS
high	415 FPS	371 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	371 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	371 FPS
medium	422 FPS	371 FPS
high	382 FPS	371 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	345 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	371 FPS
medium	331 FPS	322 FPS
high	296 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	220 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon D-1733NT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon D-1733NT
1080p
low	626 FPS	371 FPS
medium	626 FPS	371 FPS
high	626 FPS	371 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	371 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	371 FPS
medium	626 FPS	371 FPS
high	598 FPS	371 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	371 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	371 FPS
medium	492 FPS	371 FPS
high	439 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	309 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon D-1733NT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon D-1733NT

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon D-1733NT

The Xeon D-1733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,849 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-1733NT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1733NT — a 39% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon D-1733NT's 14,849 — a 51.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1733NT.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon D-1733NT
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+48%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+33%	15 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	25,029+69%	14,849
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-1733NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon D-1733NT
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon D-1733NT). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon D-1733NT
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon D-1733NT debuted at $300. On MSRP ($196 vs $300), the Core i5-13400F is $104 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 49.5 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1733NT — making the Core i5-13400F the 88.3% better value option.