PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+14.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $166 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
✅Delivers 170.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 47.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon E-2378

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,986 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($362 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon E-2378

2021

Why buy it

✅+14.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $166 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
✅Delivers 170.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 47.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,986 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($362 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon E-2378?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E-2378 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 14.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $166 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $362 MSRP, and it gives you 14.2% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that Xeon E-2378 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 170.8% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 47.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon E-2378 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E-2378
1080p
low	171 FPS	287 FPS
medium	158 FPS	257 FPS
high	132 FPS	218 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	187 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	235 FPS
medium	123 FPS	189 FPS
high	99 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	164 FPS
medium	74 FPS	134 FPS
high	59 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	91 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon E-2378

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E-2378
1080p
low	545 FPS	427 FPS
medium	464 FPS	427 FPS
high	389 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	362 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	427 FPS
medium	403 FPS	412 FPS
high	345 FPS	359 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	309 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	351 FPS
medium	247 FPS	294 FPS
high	231 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	235 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon E-2378

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E-2378
1080p
low	530 FPS	427 FPS
medium	449 FPS	427 FPS
high	415 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	427 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	427 FPS
medium	422 FPS	427 FPS
high	382 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	427 FPS
medium	331 FPS	427 FPS
high	296 FPS	399 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	332 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon E-2378

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E-2378
1080p
low	626 FPS	427 FPS
medium	626 FPS	427 FPS
high	626 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	427 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	427 FPS
medium	626 FPS	427 FPS
high	598 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	427 FPS
medium	492 FPS	427 FPS
high	439 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	427 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon E-2378

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon E-2378

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon E-2378

The Xeon E-2378 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 17,069 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E-2378 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2378 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2378 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E-2378 uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon E-2378's 17,069 — a 37.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,821, a 27.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 9,986 (13.3% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2378.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E-2378
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.8 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.6 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	25,029+47%	17,069
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+32%	1,821
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+14%	9,986

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2378 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon E-2378 — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C252,C256 (Xeon E-2378).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E-2378
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon E-2378 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs Yes (Xeon E-2378). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E-2378
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon E-2378 debuted at $362. On MSRP ($196 vs $362), the Core i5-13400F is $166 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 47.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2378 — making the Core i5-13400F the 92.1% better value option.