Core i5-13400F
Xeon E3-1225 v3
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon E3-1225 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +125.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $28 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 437.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 84W, a 19W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1225 v3 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Xeon E3-1225 v3
2013Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics P4600, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (2,000 vs 16,211).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($224 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌29.2% higher power demand at 84W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon E3-1225 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon E3-1225 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Xeon E3-1225 v3
The Xeon E3-1225 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,324 points. Launch price was $384.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 v3 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon E3-1225 v3's 5,324 — a 129.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 2,000 (156.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,108, a 73.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 3,324 (109.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1225 v3.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E3-1225 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+150% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+28% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+150% | 8192 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 25,029+370% | 5,324 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211+711% | 2,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407+117% | 1,108 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408+243% | 3,324 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E3-1225 v3 — the Core i5-13400F supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 16 (Xeon E3-1225 v3) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C226,B85,Q87,H81,Z87 (Xeon E3-1225 v3).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E3-1225 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+200% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+500% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Xeon E3-1225 v3 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4600), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Xeon E3-1225 v3 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon E3-1225 v3 rivals Core i5-4570.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E3-1225 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics P4600 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 came in at $224. On launch pricing ($196 vs $224), Core i5-13400F was $28 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 23.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1225 v3 — making the Core i5-13400F the 137.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E3-1225 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-13% | $224 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+437% | 23.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-13400F and Xeon E3-1225 v3
