
Core i5-13400F

Xeon Gold 5220R
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon Gold 5220R Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon Gold 5220R FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon Gold 5220R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- β +81.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- β Costs $1,584 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,780 MSRP).
- β Delivers 648.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,780 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (25,029 vs 30,372).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 36 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5220R, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 5220R
2020Why buy it
- β +21.3% higher PassMark.
- β +78.8% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 20 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- β 140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,327 vs 2,407).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,780 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- β130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon Gold 5220R?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon Gold 5220R Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon Gold 5220R
The Xeon Gold 5220R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 30,372 points. Launch price was $1,555.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5220R offers 24 cores / 48 threads β the Xeon Gold 5220R has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5220R β a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5220R uses Cascade Lake (2019β2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon Gold 5220R's 30,372 β a 19.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 5220R. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,407 vs 1,327, a 57.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5220R.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 24 / 48+140% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+15% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+14% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+79% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 24 MB+1820% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) | Cascade Lake (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 30,372+21% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407+81% | 1,327 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 5220R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2667 on the Xeon Gold 5220R β the Core i5-13400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5220R supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB β 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5220R). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5220R) β the Xeon Gold 5220R offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C620 (Xeon Gold 5220R).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+80% | DDR4-2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 1024 GB+433% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon Gold 5220R supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs Yes (Xeon Gold 5220R). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Xeon Gold 5220R came in at $1780. On launch pricing ($196 vs $1780), Core i5-13400F was $1584 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 17.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5220R β making the Core i5-13400F the 152.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-89% | $1780 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+647% | 17.1 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















