
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5315Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5315Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,477 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13400F
2023Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5315Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,477 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon Gold 5315Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 108 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon Gold 5315Y

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon Gold 5315Y
Xeon Gold 5315Y
The Xeon Gold 5315Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,477 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5315Y offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5315Y — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5315Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon Gold 5315Y's 20,477 — a 20% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5315Y.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+28% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+67% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 25,029+22% | 20,477 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 5315Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5315Y). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













