PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+98.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $2,248 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
✅Delivers 835.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 22,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 36 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6240R, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6240R

2020

Why buy it

✅+38.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+78.8% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,212 vs 2,407).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($2,444 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon Gold 6240R

2020

Why buy it

✅+98.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $2,248 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
✅Delivers 835.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+38.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+78.8% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 22,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 36 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6240R, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,212 vs 2,407).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($2,444 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon Gold 6240R?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6240R makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6240R is the better fit. You are getting 38.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 78.8% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $2,248 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $2,444 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Gold 6240R is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 38.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 835.7% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 13.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6240R Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 6240R
1080p
low	171 FPS	197 FPS
medium	158 FPS	159 FPS
high	132 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	157 FPS
medium	123 FPS	123 FPS
high	99 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	72 FPS
medium	74 FPS	60 FPS
high	59 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	38 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Gold 6240R

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 6240R
1080p
low	545 FPS	443 FPS
medium	464 FPS	386 FPS
high	389 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	260 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	383 FPS
medium	403 FPS	336 FPS
high	345 FPS	277 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	221 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	240 FPS
medium	247 FPS	213 FPS
high	231 FPS	188 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	154 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Gold 6240R

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 6240R
1080p
low	530 FPS	781 FPS
medium	449 FPS	634 FPS
high	415 FPS	570 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	501 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	606 FPS
medium	422 FPS	499 FPS
high	382 FPS	449 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	391 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	441 FPS
medium	331 FPS	350 FPS
high	296 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	249 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Gold 6240R

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 6240R
1080p
low	626 FPS	834 FPS
medium	626 FPS	834 FPS
high	626 FPS	738 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	644 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	744 FPS
medium	626 FPS	654 FPS
high	598 FPS	562 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	488 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	541 FPS
medium	492 FPS	483 FPS
high	439 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	364 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Gold 6240R

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon Gold 6240R

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon Gold 6240R

The Xeon Gold 6240R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,353 points. Launch price was $2,200.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6240R offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6240R has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6240R — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon Gold 6240R's 33,353 — a 28.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6240R. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 22,500 (32.5% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,212, a 66% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 17,218 (40.6% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6240R.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 6240R
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	24 / 48+140%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+15%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	35.75 MB+79%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	24 MB+1820%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	25,029	33,353+33%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	22,500+39%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+99%	1,212
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	17,218+51%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6240R — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6240R supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6240R). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6240R) — the Xeon Gold 6240R offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6240R).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 6240R
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	1024 GB+433%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6240R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6240R). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Xeon Gold 6240R targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon Gold 6240R rivals EPYC 7402.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 6240R
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Server / High-load computing

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6240R debuted at $2444. On MSRP ($196 vs $2444), the Core i5-13400F is $2248 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6240R — making the Core i5-13400F the 161.4% better value option.