PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon Gold 6336Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon Gold 6336Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,049 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $3,245 MSRP).
✅Delivers 810.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $3,245 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 185W, a 120W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6336Y.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6336Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 45,517).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 36 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6336Y, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6336Y

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+80% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($3,245 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌184.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6336Y better than Core i5-13400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6336Y makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6336Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6336Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 81.9% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 80% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6336Y is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6336Y comes in 1555.6% more expensive on MSRP at $3,245 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 810.4% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 14.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon Gold 6336Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon Gold 6336Y

The Xeon Gold 6336Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,517 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6336Y offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6336Y has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6336Y — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6336Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon Gold 6336Y's 45,517 — a 58.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6336Y. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6336Y.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 6336Y
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	24 / 48+140%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+28%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	36 MB (total)+80%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	25,029	45,517+82%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6336Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6336Y — the Core i5-13400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6336Y supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6336Y). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6336Y) — the Xeon Gold 6336Y offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6336Y).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 6336Y
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+50%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6336Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon Gold 6336Y rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 6336Y
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Xeon Gold 6336Y came in at $3245. On launch pricing ($196 vs $3245), Core i5-13400F was $3049 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6336Y — making the Core i5-13400F the 160.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Gold 6336Y
MSRP	$196-94%	$3245
Performance per Dollar	127.7+812%	14.0
Release Date	2023	2021

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6336Y on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.