PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,523 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2011.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 46,681).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 57 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8368Q, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

2021

Why buy it

✅+86.5% higher PassMark.
✅+185% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,523 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2011.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

Why buy it

✅+86.5% higher PassMark.
✅+185% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 46,681).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 57 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8368Q, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon Platinum 8368Q?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8368Q makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8368Q is the better fit. You are getting 86.5% better PassMark, backed by 38 cores and 76 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 185% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $7,523 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $7,719 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Platinum 8368Q is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 86.5% better PassMark. It is also 2011.6% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8368Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low	171 FPS	190 FPS
medium	158 FPS	154 FPS
high	132 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	157 FPS
medium	123 FPS	123 FPS
high	99 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	72 FPS
medium	74 FPS	60 FPS
high	59 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low	545 FPS	496 FPS
medium	464 FPS	431 FPS
high	389 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	286 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	425 FPS
medium	403 FPS	375 FPS
high	345 FPS	310 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	247 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	264 FPS
medium	247 FPS	237 FPS
high	231 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	174 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low	530 FPS	960 FPS
medium	449 FPS	836 FPS
high	415 FPS	790 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	701 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	759 FPS
medium	422 FPS	652 FPS
high	382 FPS	616 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	547 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	487 FPS
medium	331 FPS	383 FPS
high	296 FPS	340 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	278 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Platinum 8368Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low	626 FPS	930 FPS
medium	626 FPS	844 FPS
high	626 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	631 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	728 FPS
medium	626 FPS	641 FPS
high	598 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	473 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	525 FPS
medium	492 FPS	470 FPS
high	439 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	358 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon Platinum 8368Q's 46,681 — a 60.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	38 / 76+280%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+24%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.6 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	57 MB (total)+185%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	25,029	46,681+87%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8368Q supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 128 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	3200+63900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+4915100%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8368Q supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q debuted at $7719. On MSRP ($196 vs $7719), the Core i5-13400F is $7523 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — making the Core i5-13400F the 181.9% better value option.