Core i5-13400F vs Xeon Platinum 8461V

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8461V

48 Cores96 Thrd300 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon Platinum 8461V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon Platinum 8461V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $4,295 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 664.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 16.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 65W instead of 300W, a 235W reduction.
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Platinum 8461V.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8461V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 74,982).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8461V, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8461V

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
  • βœ…300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • ❌361.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 65W.
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8461V better than Core i5-13400F?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Platinum 8461V makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8461V is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 98 MB versus 20 MB.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8461V is the stronger fit. You are getting 199.6% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 387.5% larger total L3 cache (98 MB vs 20 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Platinum 8461V is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8461V comes in 2191.3% more expensive on MSRP at $4,491 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 664.8% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 16.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8461V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3D V-Cache and a much larger 98 MB L3 cache instead of 20 MB, more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8461V

The Xeon Platinum 8461V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 74,982 points. Launch price was $4,491.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V offers 48 cores / 96 threads β€” the Xeon Platinum 8461V has 38 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8461V β€” a 21.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon Platinum 8461V's 74,982 β€” a 99.9% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8461V. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8461V.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon Platinum 8461V
Cores / Threads
10 / 16
48 / 96+380%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+24%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+14%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
97.5 MB+388%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+60%
Process
Intel 7 nm
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024)
Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024)
PassMark
25,029
74,982+200%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
β€”
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
β€”
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8461V supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB β€” 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8461V). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8461V) β€” the Xeon Platinum 8461V offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8461V).

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon Platinum 8461V
Socket
LGA1700
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
4800
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
80+300%
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8461V supports AVX-512 instructions β€” important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon Platinum 8461V rivals EPYC 9454.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon Platinum 8461V
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
β€”
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
β€”
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($196 vs $4491), Core i5-13400F was $4295 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 16.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8461V β€” making the Core i5-13400F the 153.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP
$196-96%
$4491
Performance per Dollar
127.7+665%
16.7
Release Date
2023
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.