PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $403 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 300W, a 235W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Platinum 8571N.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8571N across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,408 vs 60,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8571N, which brings 52 cores / 104 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 52 cores / 104 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 114.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌361.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $403 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 300W, a 235W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Platinum 8571N.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 52 cores / 104 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8571N across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,408 vs 60,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8571N, which brings 52 cores / 104 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 114.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌361.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8571N better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8571N makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 300 MB vs 20 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better fit. You are getting 425.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 52 cores and 104 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1400% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8571N is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Platinum 8571N is 205.6% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 11.9% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 114.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8571N is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3D V-Cache and a much larger 300 MB L3 cache instead of 20 MB, more multi-core headroom with 52 cores / 104 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8571N Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	171 FPS	188 FPS
medium	158 FPS	165 FPS
high	132 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	155 FPS
medium	123 FPS	131 FPS
high	99 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	70 FPS
medium	74 FPS	63 FPS
high	59 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	40 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	545 FPS	515 FPS
medium	464 FPS	456 FPS
high	389 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	306 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	421 FPS
medium	403 FPS	379 FPS
high	345 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	253 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	259 FPS
medium	247 FPS	237 FPS
high	231 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	174 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	530 FPS	910 FPS
medium	449 FPS	838 FPS
high	415 FPS	791 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	698 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	782 FPS
medium	422 FPS	716 FPS
high	382 FPS	673 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	528 FPS
medium	331 FPS	444 FPS
high	296 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	330 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	626 FPS	1036 FPS
medium	626 FPS	917 FPS
high	626 FPS	790 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	674 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	849 FPS
medium	626 FPS	727 FPS
high	598 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	528 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	617 FPS
medium	492 FPS	541 FPS
high	439 FPS	477 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	404 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon Platinum 8571N

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 42 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 92.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,961, a 20.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 60,000 (136.1% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8571N). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	52 / 104+420%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+15%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	300 MB (total)+1400%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	25,029	68,385+173%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+23%	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	60,000+426%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8571N supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8571N). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	80+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8571N supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Cloud Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N debuted at $599. On MSRP ($196 vs $599), the Core i5-13400F is $403 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 114.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Core i5-13400F the 11.2% better value option.