
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4509Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Silver 4509Y.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4509Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Silver 4509Y
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,749 vs 25,029).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Xeon Silver 4509Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Silver 4509Y.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4509Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,749 vs 25,029).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon Silver 4509Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 355 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 321 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 298 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon Silver 4509Y

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon Silver 4509Y
Xeon Silver 4509Y
The Xeon Silver 4509Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 18,749 points. Launch price was $563.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4509Y offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4509Y — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon Silver 4509Y's 18,749 — a 28.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 22.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4509Y.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+12% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 22.5 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 25,029+33% | 18,749 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4509Y). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













