PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $254 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 229.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 38.8 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Xeon W-11855M

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,462 vs 25,029).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.8 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon W-11855M

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $254 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 229.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 38.8 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,462 vs 25,029).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.8 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon W-11855M?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-11855M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 43.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $254 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $450 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 229.1% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 38.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1787, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon W-11855M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-11855M
1080p
low	171 FPS	249 FPS
medium	158 FPS	230 FPS
high	132 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	165 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	222 FPS
medium	123 FPS	186 FPS
high	99 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	132 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	154 FPS
medium	74 FPS	131 FPS
high	59 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	89 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-11855M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-11855M
1080p
low	545 FPS	437 FPS
medium	464 FPS	403 FPS
high	389 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	302 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	407 FPS
medium	403 FPS	344 FPS
high	345 FPS	297 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	259 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	269 FPS
medium	247 FPS	233 FPS
high	231 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	181 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-11855M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-11855M
1080p
low	530 FPS	437 FPS
medium	449 FPS	437 FPS
high	415 FPS	437 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	383 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	437 FPS
medium	422 FPS	437 FPS
high	382 FPS	409 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	333 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	393 FPS
medium	331 FPS	341 FPS
high	296 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	231 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-11855M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-11855M
1080p
low	626 FPS	437 FPS
medium	626 FPS	437 FPS
high	626 FPS	437 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	437 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	437 FPS
medium	626 FPS	437 FPS
high	598 FPS	437 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	437 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	437 FPS
medium	492 FPS	437 FPS
high	439 FPS	410 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	352 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-11855M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon W-11855M

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon W-11855M

The Xeon W-11855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,462 points. Launch price was $450.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-11855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-11855M — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11855M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-11855M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon W-11855M's 17,462 — a 35.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11855M.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-11855M
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+11%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm SuperFin
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Tiger Lake-H (2021)
PassMark	25,029+43%	17,462
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-11855M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-11855M
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1787
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon W-11855M). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-11855M
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon W-11855M debuted at $450. On MSRP ($196 vs $450), the Core i5-13400F is $254 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 38.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11855M — making the Core i5-13400F the 106.8% better value option.