PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.8% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $356 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 386.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290TE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1290TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Xeon W-1290TE

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,478 vs 11,408).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($552 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon W-1290TE

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.8% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $356 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 386.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290TE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1290TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,478 vs 11,408).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($552 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon W-1290TE?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-1290TE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 34.8% more average FPS across 5 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 360.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $356 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $552 MSRP, and it gives you a 34.8% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 386.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 26.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon W-1290TE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1290TE
1080p
low	171 FPS	163 FPS
medium	158 FPS	144 FPS
high	132 FPS	116 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	138 FPS
medium	123 FPS	118 FPS
high	99 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	75 FPS
medium	74 FPS	69 FPS
high	59 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	43 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-1290TE

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1290TE
1080p
low	545 FPS	267 FPS
medium	464 FPS	230 FPS
high	389 FPS	198 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	178 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	230 FPS
medium	403 FPS	203 FPS
high	345 FPS	176 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	153 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	143 FPS
medium	247 FPS	126 FPS
high	231 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	104 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-1290TE

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1290TE
1080p
low	530 FPS	363 FPS
medium	449 FPS	363 FPS
high	415 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	363 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	363 FPS
medium	422 FPS	363 FPS
high	382 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	363 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	363 FPS
medium	331 FPS	345 FPS
high	296 FPS	310 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	254 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-1290TE

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1290TE
1080p
low	626 FPS	363 FPS
medium	626 FPS	363 FPS
high	626 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	363 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	363 FPS
medium	626 FPS	363 FPS
high	598 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	363 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	363 FPS
medium	492 FPS	363 FPS
high	439 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	363 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-1290TE

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon W-1290TE

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon W-1290TE

The Xeon W-1290TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,505 points. Launch price was $552.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, matching the Xeon W-1290TE's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-1290TE — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon W-1290TE's 14,505 — a 53.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,507, a 4.1% lead for the Xeon W-1290TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 2,478 (128.6% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1290TE
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	10 / 20
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+2%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+39%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	25,029+73%	14,505
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	2,507+4%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+360%	2,478

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-1290TE — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 16 (Xeon W-1290TE) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and W480 (Xeon W-1290TE).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1290TE
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Xeon W-1290TE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics P630), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Xeon W-1290TE targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1290TE
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics P630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1290TE debuted at $552. On MSRP ($196 vs $552), the Core i5-13400F is $356 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 26.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1290TE — making the Core i5-13400F the 131.7% better value option.