PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+4.7% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $298 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅Delivers 163.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 48.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W-1390

2021

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,902 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($494 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon W-1390

2021

Why buy it

✅+4.7% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $298 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅Delivers 163.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 48.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,902 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($494 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon W-1390?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-1390 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 4.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $298 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $494 MSRP, and it gives you 4.7% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Xeon W-1390 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 163.9% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 48.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon W-1390 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1390
1080p
low	171 FPS	246 FPS
medium	158 FPS	231 FPS
high	132 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	165 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	217 FPS
medium	123 FPS	184 FPS
high	99 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	151 FPS
medium	74 FPS	128 FPS
high	59 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-1390

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1390
1080p
low	545 FPS	406 FPS
medium	464 FPS	343 FPS
high	389 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	274 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	363 FPS
medium	403 FPS	315 FPS
high	345 FPS	278 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	239 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	241 FPS
medium	247 FPS	216 FPS
high	231 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	176 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-1390

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1390
1080p
low	530 FPS	598 FPS
medium	449 FPS	527 FPS
high	415 FPS	453 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	391 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	590 FPS
medium	422 FPS	490 FPS
high	382 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	361 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	421 FPS
medium	331 FPS	365 FPS
high	296 FPS	325 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	276 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-1390

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1390
1080p
low	626 FPS	598 FPS
medium	626 FPS	598 FPS
high	626 FPS	598 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	598 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	598 FPS
medium	626 FPS	598 FPS
high	598 FPS	598 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	552 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	558 FPS
medium	492 FPS	506 FPS
high	439 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	393 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-1390

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon W-1390

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon W-1390

The Xeon W-1390 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,902 points. Launch price was $494.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1390 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1390 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-1390 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon W-1390's 23,902 — a 4.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1390.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1390
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	25,029+5%	23,902
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-1390 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1390
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon W-1390). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-1390
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1390 debuted at $494. On MSRP ($196 vs $494), the Core i5-13400F is $298 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 48.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1390 — making the Core i5-13400F the 90.1% better value option.