PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 11 MB).
✅Costs $917 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,113 MSRP).
✅Delivers 688.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 16.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,113 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2145, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-2145

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,024 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,113 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon W-2145

2017

Why buy it

✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 11 MB).
✅Costs $917 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,113 MSRP).
✅Delivers 688.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 16.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,113 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2145, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,024 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,113 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon W-2145?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-2145 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 38.9% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 81.8% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 11 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $917 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $1,113 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 688.6% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 16.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, 81.8% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 11 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon W-2145 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2145
1080p
low	171 FPS	196 FPS
medium	158 FPS	168 FPS
high	132 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	165 FPS
medium	123 FPS	139 FPS
high	99 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	80 FPS
medium	74 FPS	72 FPS
high	59 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	44 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-2145

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2145
1080p
low	545 FPS	330 FPS
medium	464 FPS	285 FPS
high	389 FPS	263 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	235 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	294 FPS
medium	403 FPS	256 FPS
high	345 FPS	238 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	208 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	231 FPS
medium	247 FPS	204 FPS
high	231 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	165 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-2145

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2145
1080p
low	530 FPS	451 FPS
medium	449 FPS	451 FPS
high	415 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	451 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	451 FPS
medium	422 FPS	451 FPS
high	382 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	451 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	451 FPS
medium	331 FPS	424 FPS
high	296 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	308 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-2145

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2145
1080p
low	626 FPS	451 FPS
medium	626 FPS	451 FPS
high	626 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	451 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	451 FPS
medium	626 FPS	451 FPS
high	598 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	451 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	451 FPS
medium	492 FPS	451 FPS
high	439 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-2145

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon W-2145

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon W-2145

The Xeon W-2145 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,024 points. Launch price was $1,113.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2145 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-2145 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-2145 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon W-2145's 18,024 — a 32.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 11 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2145.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2145
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+2%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+82%	11 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	25,029+39%	18,024
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2145 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-2145 — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2145 supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Xeon W-2145). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 48 (Xeon W-2145) — the Xeon W-2145 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Intel X299,Intel C422 (Xeon W-2145).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2145
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	512 GB+167%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon W-2145). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2145
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2145 debuted at $1113. On MSRP ($196 vs $1113), the Core i5-13400F is $917 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 16.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2145 — making the Core i5-13400F the 155% better value option.