PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-2195.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2195 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 21,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2195, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 127.7 vs 186.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Xeon W-2195

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+23.8% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Delivers 46.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 186.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon W-2195

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-2195.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+23.8% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Delivers 46.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 186.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2195 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 21,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2195, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 127.7 vs 186.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2195 better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-2195 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2195 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 9.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2195 is the better fit. You are getting 29.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 23.8% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2195 is the smarter buy today. Xeon W-2195 is $46 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 46.1% better value on MSRP (186.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon W-2195 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2195
1080p
low	171 FPS	177 FPS
medium	158 FPS	143 FPS
high	132 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	145 FPS
medium	123 FPS	114 FPS
high	99 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	78 FPS
medium	74 FPS	66 FPS
high	59 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	41 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-2195

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2195
1080p
low	545 FPS	447 FPS
medium	464 FPS	385 FPS
high	389 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	294 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	394 FPS
medium	403 FPS	349 FPS
high	345 FPS	297 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	258 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	259 FPS
medium	247 FPS	229 FPS
high	231 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	185 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-2195

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2195
1080p
low	530 FPS	699 FPS
medium	449 FPS	699 FPS
high	415 FPS	699 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	699 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	699 FPS
medium	422 FPS	699 FPS
high	382 FPS	650 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	580 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	508 FPS
medium	331 FPS	414 FPS
high	296 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	298 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-2195

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2195
1080p
low	626 FPS	699 FPS
medium	626 FPS	699 FPS
high	626 FPS	699 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	691 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	699 FPS
medium	626 FPS	699 FPS
high	598 FPS	648 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	554 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	604 FPS
medium	492 FPS	534 FPS
high	439 FPS	468 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	401 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-2195

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon W-2195

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon W-2195

The Xeon W-2195 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,977 points. Launch price was $2,553.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2195 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2195 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2195 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-2195 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon W-2195's 27,977 — a 11.1% lead for the Xeon W-2195. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 21,000 (25.7% advantage for the Xeon W-2195). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,300, a 59.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 10,002 (13.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2195.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2195
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	18 / 36+80%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+7%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+9%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	24.75 MB (total)+24%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	25,029	27,977+12%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	21,000+30%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+85%	1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+14%	10,002

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2195 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-2195 — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2195 supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Xeon W-2195). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 48 (Xeon W-2195) — the Xeon W-2195 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C422 (Xeon W-2195).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2195
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	512 GB+167%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-2195 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2195). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Xeon W-2195 targets Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon W-2195 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2195
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2195 debuted at $150. On MSRP ($196 vs $150), the Xeon W-2195 is $46 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 186.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2195 — making the Xeon W-2195 the 37.4% better value option.