PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $916 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
✅Delivers 407.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-2275.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2275 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 19,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2275, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-2275

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,112 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon W-2275

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $916 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
✅Delivers 407.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-2275.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2275 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 19,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2275, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,112 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2275 better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-2275 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2275 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2275 is the better fit. You are getting 17.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2275 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon W-2275 is 467.3% more expensive on MSRP at $1,112 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 407.6% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 25.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon W-2275 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2275
1080p
low	171 FPS	285 FPS
medium	158 FPS	254 FPS
high	132 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	177 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	234 FPS
medium	123 FPS	190 FPS
high	99 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	164 FPS
medium	74 FPS	134 FPS
high	59 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	90 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-2275

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2275
1080p
low	545 FPS	551 FPS
medium	464 FPS	457 FPS
high	389 FPS	380 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	342 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	457 FPS
medium	403 FPS	395 FPS
high	345 FPS	333 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	287 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	284 FPS
medium	247 FPS	246 FPS
high	231 FPS	226 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	198 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-2275

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2275
1080p
low	530 FPS	699 FPS
medium	449 FPS	699 FPS
high	415 FPS	699 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	699 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	699 FPS
medium	422 FPS	699 FPS
high	382 FPS	699 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	620 FPS
medium	331 FPS	521 FPS
high	296 FPS	462 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	388 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-2275

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2275
1080p
low	626 FPS	699 FPS
medium	626 FPS	699 FPS
high	626 FPS	699 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	699 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	699 FPS
medium	626 FPS	699 FPS
high	598 FPS	699 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	640 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	699 FPS
medium	492 FPS	618 FPS
high	439 FPS	546 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon W-2275

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon W-2275

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon W-2275

The Xeon W-2275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,974 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2275 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2275 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2275 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2275 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon W-2275's 27,974 — a 11.1% lead for the Xeon W-2275. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 19,000 (15.8% advantage for the Xeon W-2275). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,596, a 40.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 11,000 (3.6% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-2275.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2275
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	14 / 28+40%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.8 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+4%	19.25 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	25,029	27,974+12%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	19,000+17%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+51%	1,596
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+4%	11,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2275 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-2275 — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2275 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Xeon W-2275). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 48 (Xeon W-2275) — the Xeon W-2275 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C422 (Xeon W-2275).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2275
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	1024 GB+433%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-2275 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2275). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Xeon W-2275 targets Professional Content Creation / VFX. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon W-2275 rivals Core i9-10940X.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-2275
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Professional Content Creation / VFX

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2275 debuted at $1112. On MSRP ($196 vs $1112), the Core i5-13400F is $916 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 25.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2275 — making the Core i5-13400F the 134.2% better value option.