PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon W-3175X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon W-3175X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,803 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 730.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 255W, a 190W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-3175X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3175X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 31,350).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 39 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3175X, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3175X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+92.5% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌292.3% higher power demand at 255W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3175X better than Core i5-13400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3175X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3175X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3175X is the stronger fit. You are getting 93.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 92.5% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3175X is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-3175X comes in 1430.1% more expensive on MSRP at $2,999 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 730.3% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 15.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon W-3175X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon W-3175X

The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3175X has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 19% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 59.3% lead for the Xeon W-3175X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 31,350 (63.7% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,467, a 48.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 17,358 (41.4% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-3175X
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	28 / 56+180%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+21%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.1 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	38.5 MB (total)+93%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	25,029	46,125+84%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	31,350+93%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+64%	1,467
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	17,358+52%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the Core i5-13400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3175X supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 6 (Xeon W-3175X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-3175X
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+80%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	512 GB+167%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon W-3175X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3175X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-3175X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Xeon W-3175X came in at $2999. On launch pricing ($196 vs $2999), Core i5-13400F was $2803 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the Core i5-13400F the 157% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon W-3175X
MSRP	$196-93%	$2999
Performance per Dollar	127.7+729%	15.4
Release Date	2023	2018

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3175X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.