Core i5-13400F vs Xeon w5-2445

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon w5-2445

10 Cores20 Thrd175 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon w5-2445 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon w5-2445 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon w5-2445: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…+4.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • βœ…Draws 65W instead of 175W, a 110W reduction.
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon w5-2445.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2445 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 26 MB).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-2445, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon w5-2445 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon w5-2445

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +15.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+31.3% larger total L3 cache (26 MB vs 20 MB).
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
  • βœ…220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,500 vs 16,211).
  • ❌169.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 65W.
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon w5-2445?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon w5-2445 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 4.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that Xeon w5-2445 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 15.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon w5-2445 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 31.3% larger total L3 cache (26 MB vs 20 MB) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon w5-2445 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Xeon w5-2445

The Xeon w5-2445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 175 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 32,213 points. Launch price was $839.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, matching the Xeon w5-2445's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w5-2445 β€” identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon w5-2445 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon w5-2445's 32,213 β€” a 25.1% lead for the Xeon w5-2445. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 15,500 (4.5% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 2,407 vs 1,822, a 27.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 10,719 (6.2% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon w5-2445.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon w5-2445
Cores / Threads
10 / 16
10 / 20
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz+24%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
26.25 MB+31%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+60%
Process
Intel 7 nm
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024)
Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024)
PassMark
25,029
32,213+29%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211+5%
15,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407+32%
1,822
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408+6%
10,719
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-2445 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon w5-2445 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB β€” 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Xeon w5-2445). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 64 (Xeon w5-2445) β€” the Xeon w5-2445 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and W790 (Xeon w5-2445).

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon w5-2445
Socket
LGA1700
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
64+220%
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon w5-2445 supports AVX-512 instructions β€” important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon w5-2445). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Xeon w5-2445 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon w5-2445 rivals Threadripper 7945WX.

FeatureCore i5-13400FXeon w5-2445
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming
Professional Workstation