PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+4.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Draws 65W instead of 175W, a 110W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon w5-2445.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2445 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 26 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-2445, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon w5-2445 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon w5-2445

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+31.3% larger total L3 cache (26 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,500 vs 16,211).
❌169.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon w5-2445

2023

Why buy it

✅+4.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Draws 65W instead of 175W, a 110W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon w5-2445.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+31.3% larger total L3 cache (26 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2445 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 26 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-2445, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon w5-2445 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,500 vs 16,211).
❌169.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon w5-2445?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon w5-2445 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 4.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 4.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Xeon w5-2445 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 15.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-2445 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 31.3% larger total L3 cache (26 MB vs 20 MB) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon w5-2445 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon w5-2445
1080p
low	171 FPS	186 FPS
medium	158 FPS	155 FPS
high	132 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	151 FPS
medium	123 FPS	121 FPS
high	99 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	83 FPS
medium	74 FPS	71 FPS
high	59 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon w5-2445

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon w5-2445
1080p
low	545 FPS	585 FPS
medium	464 FPS	487 FPS
high	389 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	361 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	496 FPS
medium	403 FPS	430 FPS
high	345 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	312 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	307 FPS
medium	247 FPS	269 FPS
high	231 FPS	248 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	219 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon w5-2445

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon w5-2445
1080p
low	530 FPS	805 FPS
medium	449 FPS	805 FPS
high	415 FPS	805 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	805 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	805 FPS
medium	422 FPS	765 FPS
high	382 FPS	725 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	650 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	560 FPS
medium	331 FPS	458 FPS
high	296 FPS	417 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	338 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon w5-2445

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon w5-2445
1080p
low	626 FPS	805 FPS
medium	626 FPS	805 FPS
high	626 FPS	805 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	787 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	805 FPS
medium	626 FPS	805 FPS
high	598 FPS	726 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	621 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	681 FPS
medium	492 FPS	594 FPS
high	439 FPS	524 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon w5-2445

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon w5-2445

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon w5-2445

The Xeon w5-2445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 175 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 32,213 points. Launch price was $839.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, matching the Xeon w5-2445's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w5-2445 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon w5-2445 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon w5-2445's 32,213 — a 25.1% lead for the Xeon w5-2445. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 15,500 (4.5% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,822, a 27.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 10,719 (6.2% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon w5-2445.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon w5-2445
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	10 / 20
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.1 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	26.25 MB+31%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	25,029	32,213+29%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+5%	15,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+32%	1,822
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+6%	10,719

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-2445 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon w5-2445 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Xeon w5-2445). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 64 (Xeon w5-2445) — the Xeon w5-2445 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and W790 (Xeon w5-2445).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon w5-2445
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon w5-2445 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon w5-2445). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Xeon w5-2445 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon w5-2445 rivals Threadripper 7945WX.