
Core i5-13400F

Z-01
Core i5-13400F vs Z-01 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Z-01 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Z-01: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4013.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Delivers 2869.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 4.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FT1 and older memory support.
- β 400% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Z-01.
Trade-offs
- β292% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- β983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Z-01 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Z-01
2011Why buy it
- β Costs $146 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- β Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6250, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (180 vs 11,408).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- βOlder platform position on FT1, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Z-01?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Z-01 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Z-01
The Z-01 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Desna (2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 215 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Z-01 offers 2 cores / 2 threads β the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 1 GHz on the Z-01 β a 128.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F. The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Z-01 uses Desna (2011) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Z-01's 215 β a 196.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,407 vs 100, a 184% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 180 (193.8% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 0 kB on the Z-01.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Z-01 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+400% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+360% | 1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | β |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-83% | 40 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) | Desna (2011) |
| PassMark | 25,029+11541% | 215 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407+2307% | 100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408+6238% | 180 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Z-01 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR3-1066 on the Z-01 β the Core i5-13400F supports 350.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB β 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 1 (Z-01). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Z-01) β the Core i5-13400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Desna (Z-01).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Z-01 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FT1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+350% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+4700% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+400% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Z-01). The Z-01 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Z-01 targets Tablet/Netbook. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Z-01 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Radeon HD 6250 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Tablet/Netbook |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Z-01 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($196 vs $50), Z-01 was $146 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 4.3 pts/$ for the Z-01 β making the Core i5-13400F the 187% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Z-01 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196 | $50-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+2870% | 4.3 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















