
Core i5-13450HX
Popular choices:

Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13450HX
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,869 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.1% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13450HX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i5-13450HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i5-13450HX
2023Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.1% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13450HX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,869 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i5-13450HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core i5-13450HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13450HX | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13450HX | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 351 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 238 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13450HX | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 295 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13450HX | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 941 FPS |
| medium | 622 FPS | 941 FPS |
| high | 622 FPS | 923 FPS |
| ultra | 622 FPS | 831 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 941 FPS |
| medium | 622 FPS | 850 FPS |
| high | 592 FPS | 738 FPS |
| ultra | 517 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13450HX and Core i5-13600K

Core i5-13450HX
Core i5-13450HX
The Core i5-13450HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 20 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,869 points. Launch price was $326.

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13450HX packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-13600K offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13450HX versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13450HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-13600K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13450HX scores 24,869 against the Core i5-13600K's 37,655 — a 40.9% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13450HX vs 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i5-13450HX | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 14 / 20+40% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+46% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 24,869 | 37,655+51% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13450HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-13600K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13450HX | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-13450HX) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-13450HX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13450HX | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













