
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core i7-11700B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 71.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 66.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌1.9% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$323 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Core i7-11700B
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,581 vs 37,655).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.8 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13600K
2022Core i7-11700B
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 71.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 66.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌1.9% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$323 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,581 vs 37,655).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.8 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core i7-11700B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-11700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-11700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 317 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 219 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-11700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 260 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-11700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 417 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 358 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core i7-11700B

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core i7-11700B
Core i7-11700B
The Core i7-11700B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: Up to 3200 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 21,581 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-11700B offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-11700B — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-11700B uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core i7-11700B's 21,581 — a 54.3% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-11700B.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-11700B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+6% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+9% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm SuperFin |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 37,655+74% | 21,581 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 10,287 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,265 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,050 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-11700B uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-11700B — the Core i5-13600K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and HM570,QM580,WM590 (Core i7-11700B).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-11700B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-11700B supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Intel UHD Graphics 750 (Core i7-11700B) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Core i7-11700B targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-11700B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Core i7-11700B debuted at $323. On MSRP ($329 vs $323), the Core i7-11700B is $6 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 66.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-11700B — making the Core i5-13600K the 52.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-11700B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $323-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+71% | 66.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













