
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core i7-12700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌31.6% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-12700.
Core i7-12700
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,055 vs 37,655).
Core i5-13600K
2022Core i7-12700
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌31.6% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-12700.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,055 vs 37,655).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core i7-12700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 118 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 610 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 311 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 730 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 360 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core i7-12700

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core i7-12700
Core i7-12700
The Core i7-12700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,055 points. Launch price was $349.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-12700 offers 12 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-12700 — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-12700 uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core i7-12700's 30,055 — a 22.4% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+17% | 12 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+4% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+67% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 25 MB (total)+4% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 37,655+25% | 30,055 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,568 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,497 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,448 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i7-12700).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i7-12700). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Core i7-12700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700 rivals Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x / VT-d / EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Core i7-12700 debuted at $250. On MSRP ($329 vs $250), the Core i7-12700 is $79 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 120.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700 — making the Core i7-12700 the 4.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $250-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5 | 120.2+5% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













