
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 255H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+21.7% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255H across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 255H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌380.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 26W.
Core Ultra 7 255H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 26W instead of 125W, a 99W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,932 vs 37,655).
Core i5-13600K
2022Core Ultra 7 255H
2025Why buy it
- ✅+21.7% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 26W instead of 125W, a 99W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255H across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 255H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌380.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 26W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,932 vs 37,655).
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 255H better than Core i5-13600K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 255H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 255H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 773 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 715 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 271 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 255H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 773 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 773 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 773 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 662 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 773 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 635 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 544 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 642 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 534 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 409 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 255H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 773 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 773 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 773 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 773 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 773 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 773 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 703 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 609 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 612 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 427 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core Ultra 7 255H

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core Ultra 7 255H
Core Ultra 7 255H
The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 255H offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 255H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core Ultra 7 255H's 30,932 — a 19.6% lead for the Core i5-13600K. Both processors carry 24 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 255H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 16+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.4 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Arrow Lake-H (2025) |
| PassMark | 37,655+22% | 30,932 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,700 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 255H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) — the Core Ultra 7 255H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 255H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Intel Arc Graphics 140T (Core Ultra 7 255H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 255H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Intel Arc Graphics 140T |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | High-End Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













