
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 265U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.7% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 7 265U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 265U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌792.9% higher power demand at 125W vs 14W.
Core Ultra 7 265U
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 125W, a 111W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,900 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022Core Ultra 7 265U
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.7% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 7 265U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 125W, a 111W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 265U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌792.9% higher power demand at 125W vs 14W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,900 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core Ultra 7 265U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 415 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 211 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 348 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 414 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core Ultra 7 265U

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core Ultra 7 265U
Core Ultra 7 265U
The Core Ultra 7 265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,900 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265U — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265U uses Arrow Lake-U (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core Ultra 7 265U's 17,900 — a 71.1% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 12 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265U.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+17% | 12 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+46% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+100% | 12 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Arrow Lake-U (2025) |
| PassMark | 37,655+110% | 17,900 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 265U). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core Ultra 7 265U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













