
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 9 285H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+9.7% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core Ultra 9 285H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Core Ultra 9 285H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,327 vs 37,655).
Core i5-13600K
2022Core Ultra 9 285H
2025Why buy it
- ✅+9.7% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core Ultra 9 285H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,327 vs 37,655).
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 285H better than Core i5-13600K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 749 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 602 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 650 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 544 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 260 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 858 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 826 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 717 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 611 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 858 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 684 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 591 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 599 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 380 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 858 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 858 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 839 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 742 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 858 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 780 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 680 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 587 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 416 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core Ultra 9 285H

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core Ultra 9 285H
Core Ultra 9 285H
The Core Ultra 9 285H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,327 points. Launch price was $651.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285H — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 285H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core Ultra 9 285H's 34,327 — a 9.2% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285H.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 16+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+21% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+50% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Arrow Lake-H (2025) |
| PassMark | 37,655+10% | 34,327 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 26,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,720 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,330 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 28 (Core Ultra 9 285H) — the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and SoC (Core Ultra 9 285H).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 9 285H). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 285H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Core Ultra 9 285H targets High-end Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core Ultra 9 285H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores) |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | High-end Mobile Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













