
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

EPYC 72F3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+38.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 72F3 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (24 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while EPYC 72F3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 72F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 256 MB vs 24 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,252 vs 37,655).
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022EPYC 72F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+38.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 72F3 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 256 MB vs 24 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (24 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while EPYC 72F3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,252 vs 37,655).
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than EPYC 72F3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 583 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 362 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 300 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 220 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 681 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 534 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 466 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 681 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 655 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 565 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 499 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 427 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and EPYC 72F3

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3
The EPYC 72F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,252 points. Launch price was $2,468.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 72F3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 72F3 — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 72F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the EPYC 72F3's 27,252 — a 32.1% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 72F3.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+24% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 256 MB (total)+967% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 37,655+38% | 27,252 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 72F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (EPYC 72F3). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 72F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













