
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,544 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,544 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 279 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 193 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 293 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,544 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE's 21,544 — a 54.4% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+2% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+3% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Phoenix2 (2024) |
| PassMark | 37,655+75% | 21,544 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












