PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +82.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Delivers 8.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 105.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 1700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
135% HIGHER MSRP
$329 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.

Ryzen 7 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $189 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 37,655).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 105.5 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Ryzen 7 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +82.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Delivers 8.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 105.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 1700 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Costs $189 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.

Trade-offs

❌
135% HIGHER MSRP
$329 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 37,655).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 105.5 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($140 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 7 1700?

Yes. Core i5-13600K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 82.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 154.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13600K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 82.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 154.9% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is 135.0% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $140 MSRP, and it gives you a 82.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 8.5% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 105.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 1700 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13600K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 1700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 1700
1080p
low	281 FPS	168 FPS
medium	264 FPS	144 FPS
high	220 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	142 FPS
medium	198 FPS	119 FPS
high	158 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	64 FPS
medium	133 FPS	58 FPS
high	102 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 1700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 1700
1080p
low	632 FPS	277 FPS
medium	533 FPS	245 FPS
high	450 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	180 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	244 FPS
medium	474 FPS	221 FPS
high	403 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	162 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	177 FPS
medium	282 FPS	165 FPS
high	269 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	120 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 1700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 1700
1080p
low	663 FPS	369 FPS
medium	543 FPS	369 FPS
high	477 FPS	369 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	369 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	369 FPS
medium	499 FPS	369 FPS
high	434 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	311 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	350 FPS
medium	381 FPS	284 FPS
high	344 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	209 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 1700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 1700
1080p
low	941 FPS	369 FPS
medium	941 FPS	369 FPS
high	923 FPS	369 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	369 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	369 FPS
medium	850 FPS	369 FPS
high	738 FPS	369 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	369 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	369 FPS
medium	588 FPS	369 FPS
high	529 FPS	361 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	311 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 1700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 7 1700

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Ryzen 7 1700

The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 1700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 1700 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 7 1700's 14,772 — a 87.3% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 1700
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+38%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+17%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB+50%	16384 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	4096 kB+100%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	37,655+155%	14,772
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	8,065
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 7 1700 — the Core i5-13600K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 1700) — the Ryzen 7 1700 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and B350,X370,B450,X470,A520,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 1700).

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 1700
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 7 1700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 1700
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 1700 debuted at $140. On MSRP ($329 vs $140), the Ryzen 7 1700 is $189 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 105.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 1700 — making the Core i5-13600K the 8.1% better value option.