
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3800XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 58.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 3800XT needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 3800XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,441 vs 37,655).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.7 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 7 3800XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 58.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 3800XT needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,441 vs 37,655).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.7 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 7 3800XT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 207 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 554 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 586 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 398 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 7 3800XT

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 7 3800XT
Ryzen 7 3800XT
The Ryzen 7 3800XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,441 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3800XT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3800XT — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 7 3800XT's 23,441 — a 46.5% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3800XT.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+9% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 37,655+61% | 23,441 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3800XT — the Core i5-13600K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3800XT) — the Ryzen 7 3800XT offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3800XT). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 3800XT targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3800XT debuted at $399. On MSRP ($329 vs $399), the Core i5-13600K is $70 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 58.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3800XT — making the Core i5-13600K the 64.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-18% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+95% | 58.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












