Core i5-13600K vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13600K

14 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2018

Popular choices:

••••••i5-13600K•••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-13600K

14 / 20

37,655

+145.4%

15,342

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +66.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Delivers 123.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
10% HIGHER MSRP
$329 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 37,655).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +66.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Delivers 123.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
10% HIGHER MSRP
$329 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 37,655).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700?

Yes. Core i5-13600K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 66.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 145.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13600K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 66.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 145.4% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is 10.0% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 66.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 123.1% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 51.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13600K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
1080p
low	281 FPS	176 FPS
medium	264 FPS	154 FPS
high	220 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	145 FPS
medium	198 FPS	122 FPS
high	158 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	66 FPS
medium	133 FPS	59 FPS
high	102 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
1080p
low	632 FPS	336 FPS
medium	533 FPS	297 FPS
high	450 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	237 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	307 FPS
medium	474 FPS	278 FPS
high	403 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	215 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	225 FPS
medium	282 FPS	207 FPS
high	269 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	168 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
1080p
low	663 FPS	384 FPS
medium	543 FPS	384 FPS
high	477 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	384 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	384 FPS
medium	499 FPS	384 FPS
high	434 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	384 FPS
medium	381 FPS	319 FPS
high	344 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	226 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
1080p
low	941 FPS	384 FPS
medium	941 FPS	384 FPS
high	923 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	384 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	384 FPS
medium	850 FPS	384 FPS
high	738 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	384 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	384 FPS
medium	588 FPS	384 FPS
high	529 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	332 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700's 15,342 — a 84.2% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+24%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB+50%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-42%	12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	37,655+145%	15,342

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 debuted at $299. On MSRP ($329 vs $299), the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is $30 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 51.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — making the Core i5-13600K the 76.2% better value option.