PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +54.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Delivers 122.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Core i5-13600K.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,959 vs 37,655).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.5 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +54.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Delivers 122.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Core i5-13600K.

Trade-offs

❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,959 vs 37,655).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.5 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X?

Yes. Core i5-13600K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 54.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 122% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13600K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 54.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 122% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is in basically the same MSRP band at $329 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 54.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 122.0% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 51.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13600K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
1080p
low	281 FPS	223 FPS
medium	264 FPS	191 FPS
high	220 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	113 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	183 FPS
medium	198 FPS	150 FPS
high	158 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	71 FPS
medium	133 FPS	63 FPS
high	102 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	38 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
1080p
low	632 FPS	346 FPS
medium	533 FPS	305 FPS
high	450 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	240 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	316 FPS
medium	474 FPS	285 FPS
high	403 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	218 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	232 FPS
medium	282 FPS	213 FPS
high	269 FPS	195 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	170 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
1080p
low	663 FPS	424 FPS
medium	543 FPS	424 FPS
high	477 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	424 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	424 FPS
medium	499 FPS	424 FPS
high	434 FPS	405 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	340 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	391 FPS
medium	381 FPS	323 FPS
high	344 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	228 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
1080p
low	941 FPS	424 FPS
medium	941 FPS	424 FPS
high	923 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	424 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	424 FPS
medium	850 FPS	424 FPS
high	738 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	424 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	424 FPS
medium	588 FPS	424 FPS
high	529 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	359 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 16,959 — a 75.8% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+24%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	24 MB+50%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-42%	12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	37,655+122%	16,959
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,255
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	6,243

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — the Core i5-13600K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and X470,B450,X370,B350,A320 (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X).

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($329 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 51.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — making the Core i5-13600K the 75.8% better value option.