PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP8 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1462.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 8W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 8W instead of 125W, a 117W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,852 vs 37,655).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Older platform position on FP7/FP8, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP8 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Draws 8W instead of 125W, a 117W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1462.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 8W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,852 vs 37,655).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Older platform position on FP7/FP8, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS?

Yes. Core i5-13600K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 7.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 40.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13600K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 7.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 40.2% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13600K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP7/FP8, 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low	281 FPS	269 FPS
medium	264 FPS	243 FPS
high	220 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	236 FPS
medium	198 FPS	193 FPS
high	158 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	164 FPS
medium	133 FPS	136 FPS
high	102 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	92 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low	632 FPS	510 FPS
medium	533 FPS	419 FPS
high	450 FPS	361 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	322 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	446 FPS
medium	474 FPS	386 FPS
high	403 FPS	332 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	283 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	294 FPS
medium	282 FPS	266 FPS
high	269 FPS	251 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	216 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low	663 FPS	671 FPS
medium	543 FPS	671 FPS
high	477 FPS	647 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	546 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	671 FPS
medium	499 FPS	637 FPS
high	434 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	464 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	541 FPS
medium	381 FPS	473 FPS
high	344 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	355 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low	941 FPS	671 FPS
medium	941 FPS	671 FPS
high	923 FPS	671 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	671 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	671 FPS
medium	850 FPS	671 FPS
high	738 FPS	660 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	573 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	572 FPS
medium	588 FPS	511 FPS
high	529 FPS	457 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	394 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS's 26,852 — a 33.5% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.8 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	24 MB+50%	16 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	8 MB+300%
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	37,655+40%	26,852

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Socket	LGA1700	FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.