
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+29.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,088 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+29.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,088 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS better than Core i5-13600K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 636 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 547 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 343 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 727 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS's 29,088 — a 25.7% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 37,655+29% | 29,088 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,930 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,332 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,037 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Desktop | Enterprise Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












