PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 46,828).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.

Trade-offs

❌
24.3% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

Core i5-13600K

2022

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 46,828).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.

Trade-offs

❌
24.3% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 better than Core i5-13600K?

Yes. Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 14.1% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data, 24.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.1% more average FPS across 45 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is the better fit. You are getting 24.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is 24.3% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.1% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.0% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 114.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i5-13600K can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 14/20. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
1080p
low	281 FPS	269 FPS
medium	264 FPS	244 FPS
high	220 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	260 FPS
medium	198 FPS	212 FPS
high	158 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	151 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	180 FPS
medium	133 FPS	147 FPS
high	102 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	98 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
1080p
low	632 FPS	660 FPS
medium	533 FPS	567 FPS
high	450 FPS	426 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	368 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	555 FPS
medium	474 FPS	495 FPS
high	403 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	306 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	313 FPS
medium	282 FPS	283 FPS
high	269 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	214 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
1080p
low	663 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	543 FPS	1118 FPS
high	477 FPS	1041 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	940 FPS
medium	499 FPS	836 FPS
high	434 FPS	754 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	574 FPS
medium	381 FPS	495 FPS
high	344 FPS	445 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	378 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
1080p
low	941 FPS	1171 FPS
medium	941 FPS	1015 FPS
high	923 FPS	981 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	854 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	1019 FPS
medium	850 FPS	888 FPS
high	738 FPS	762 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	639 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	754 FPS
medium	588 FPS	658 FPS
high	529 FPS	569 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 46,828 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945's 46,828 — a 21.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+17%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz	5.4 GHz+6%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	24 MB	64 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	37,655	46,828+24%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	28,905
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,206
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,832

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945).

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs true (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 rivals Core i9-13900.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 debuted at $409. On MSRP ($329 vs $409), the Core i5-13600K is $80 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — making the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 the 0% better value option.