
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V2718
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +81.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 80.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 63.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌31.6% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
Ryzen Embedded V2718
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,831 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.3 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen Embedded V2718
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +81.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 80.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 63.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌31.6% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,831 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.3 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen Embedded V2718?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Embedded V2718 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Embedded V2718 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 104 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Embedded V2718 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 267 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Embedded V2718 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen Embedded V2718

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen Embedded V2718
Ryzen Embedded V2718
The Ryzen Embedded V2718 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,831 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V2718 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.15 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2718 — a 20.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2718 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen Embedded V2718's 15,831 — a 81.6% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2718.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Embedded V2718 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+23% | 4.15 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+106% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+200% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 37,655+138% | 15,831 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 654 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,124 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 4,551 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2718 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus DDR4 3200 MHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2718 — the Ryzen Embedded V2718 supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and SoC (Ryzen Embedded V2718).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Embedded V2718 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4 3200 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs true (Ryzen Embedded V2718). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Radeon Vega 7 (Ryzen Embedded V2718) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen Embedded V2718 targets Embedded.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Embedded V2718 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Vega 7 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | Embedded |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V2718 debuted at $250. On MSRP ($329 vs $250), the Ryzen Embedded V2718 is $79 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 63.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V2718 — making the Core i5-13600K the 57.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Embedded V2718 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $250-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+81% | 63.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













