
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Xeon 6357P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6357P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon 6357P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon 6357P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,401 vs 37,655).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022Xeon 6357P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6357P needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon 6357P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,401 vs 37,655).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Xeon 6357P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Xeon 6357P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Xeon 6357P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 233 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Xeon 6357P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Xeon 6357P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 652 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 704 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 537 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Xeon 6357P

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Xeon 6357P
Xeon 6357P
The Xeon 6357P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 30,401 points. Launch price was $556.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon 6357P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6357P — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6357P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Xeon 6357P's 30,401 — a 21.3% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6357P.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Xeon 6357P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+17% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 37,655+24% | 30,401 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,784 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,769 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and Server chipsets (Xeon 6357P).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Xeon 6357P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6357P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6357P). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon 6357P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Xeon 6357P targets Edge Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon 6357P rivals Core i7-14700.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Xeon 6357P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Edge Server / Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













