
Core i5-14600T
Popular choices:

Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-14600T
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $154 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,238 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌60.4% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$255 MSRP
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Core i5-14600T
2024Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $154 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,238 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌60.4% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$255 MSRP
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i5-14600T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-14600T | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-14600T | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 261 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-14600T | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-14600T | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 970 FPS |
| medium | 681 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 681 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 636 FPS | 689 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 829 FPS |
| medium | 681 FPS | 740 FPS |
| high | 592 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 522 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 404 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14600T and Core i7-13700K

Core i5-14600T
Core i5-14600T
The Core i5-14600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,238 points. Launch price was $255.

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14600T packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-14600T versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-14600T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14600T scores 27,238 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 50.8% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,626 vs 2,846, a 8% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14600T vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 24+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz+89% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 27,238 | 45,784+68% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 31,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,626 | 2,846+8% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,980 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-14600T) and Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K).
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-14600T) vs true (Core i7-13700K). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-14600T) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-14600T rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | true |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-14600T launched at $255 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. On MSRP ($255 vs $409), the Core i5-14600T is $154 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14600T delivers 106.8 pts/$ vs 111.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the Core i7-13700K the 4.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $255-38% | $409 |
| Performance per Dollar | 106.8 | 111.9+5% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













