
Core i5-14600T

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Core i5-14600T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-14600T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-14600T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-14600T
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $255 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,864 vs 27,238).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS better than Core i5-14600T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-14600T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14600T
The Core i5-14600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,238 points. Launch price was $255.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,864 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14600T packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-14600T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-14600T versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-14600T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14600T scores 27,238 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS's 26,864 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i5-14600T. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14600T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz+83% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 27,238+1% | 26,864 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,626 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14600T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-14600T) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS). The Core i5-14600T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-14600T rivals Ryzen 7 7700.
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













