Core i5-2415M
VS
Core 2 Quad Q8300

Core i5-2415M vs Core 2 Quad Q8300

Intel

Core i5-2415M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8300

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2415M is positioned at rank 898 and the Core 2 Quad Q8300 is on rank 985, so the Core i5-2415M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2415M

#886
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1518%
#887
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1496%
#888
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1373%
#889
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1367%
#890
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1354%
#892
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1308%
#893
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1254%
#894
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1252%
#895
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1218%
#898
Core i5-2415M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#900
Core i7-8705G
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#902
Pentium Dual Core T2410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#903
FX-8800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#905
Core i7-8809G
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
97%
#911
Core i7-6820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
96%
#912
Athlon II Neo K325
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q8300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
29105%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
27501%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
19968%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6016%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4765%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4168%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2387%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2356%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2145%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2145%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2121%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2064%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2035%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2027%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2009%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
95%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
100%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
99%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
99%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
98%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
97%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
96%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
96%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
95%
#996
Core i7-930
MSRP: $294|Avg: $20
95%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
94%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
94%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-2415M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Quad Q8300 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-2415MCore 2 Quad Q8300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-2415MCore 2 Quad Q8300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2415M and Core 2 Quad Q8300

Intel

Core i5-2415M

The Core i5-2415M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,933 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8300

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i5-2415M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q8300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-2415M versus 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8300 — a 14.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-2415M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-2415M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2415M scores 1,933 against the Core 2 Quad Q8300's 1,917 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-2415M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2415M vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q8300.

FeatureCore i5-2415MCore 2 Quad Q8300
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+16%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4 MB (total)+1500%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
PassMark
1,933
1,917
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2415M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-2415MCore 2 Quad Q8300
Socket
BGA1023
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i5-2415M) / not specified (Core 2 Quad Q8300). The Core i5-2415M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2415M targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i5-2415MCore 2 Quad Q8300
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile